We use cookies mainly to collect anonymised visitor statistics but also to improve the visitor experience (for example, show and play videos). Not accepting these cookies may limit features and may adversely affect the visitor experience. Full details in our cookie policy and privacy policy (see below).
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
One Response
Just a thought on this. One could make an interesting parallel with riesling.
Alsace producers have successfully lobbied that riesling is so intimately connected to Alsace so that no other wine region in France will be allowed to put “riesling” on the label. (See other story here on BKWine Mag.)
Similarly one could argue that pinotage is really the emblematic grape variety of South Africa. Actually much more linked to South Africa than what riesling is to Alsace.
So with a similar logic to the Alsatians surely they should forbid the mention of pinotage on the label on French wines?